Critique of Judgment,9780486445434

Critique of Judgment

by
ISBN13: 9780486445434
ISBN10: 0486445437
Format: Paperback
Pub. Date: 2005-09-21
Publisher(s): Dover Publications
  • Free Shipping Icon

    Free Shipping On All Orders!*

    Free economy shipping applies to all orders shipped to residential addresses. Orders shipped to campus receive free standard shipping. Free shipping offers do not apply to Marketplace items.

  • eCampus.com Device Compatibility Matrix

    Click the device icon to install or view instructions

    Apple iOS | iPad, iPhone, iPod
    Apple iOS | iPad, iPhone, iPod
    Android Devices | Android Tables & Phones OS 2.2 or higher | *Kindle Fire
    Android Devices | Android Tables & Phones OS 2.2 or higher | *Kindle Fire
    Windows 10 / 8 / 7 / Vista / XP
    Windows 10 / 8 / 7 / Vista / XP
    Mac OS X | **iMac / Macbook
    Mac OS X | **iMac / Macbook
    Enjoy offline reading with these devices
    Apple Devices
    Android Devices
    Windows Devices
    Mac Devices
    iPad, iPhone, iPod
    Our reader is compatible
     
     
     
    Android 2.2 +
     
    Our reader is compatible
     
     
    Kindle Fire
     
    Our reader is compatible
     
     
    Windows
    10 / 8 / 7 / Vista / XP
     
     
    Our reader is compatible
     
    Mac
     
     
     
    Our reader is compatible
List Price: $10.61

Buy New

Usually Ships in 5-7 Business Days
$10.60
Add to Cart

Rent Textbook

Select for Price
Add to Cart
There was a problem. Please try again later.

Rent Digital

Rent Digital Options
Online:1825 Days access
Downloadable:Lifetime Access
$10.74
$10.74
Add to Cart

Used Textbook

We're Sorry
Sold Out

Buy from our Marketplace starting at $6.66

How Marketplace Works:

  • This item is offered by an independent seller and not shipped from our warehouse
  • Item details like edition and cover design may differ from our description; see seller's comments before ordering.
  • Sellers much confirm and ship within two business days; otherwise, the order will be cancelled and refunded.
  • Marketplace purchases cannot be returned to eCampus.com. Contact the seller directly for inquiries; if no response within two days, contact customer service.
  • Additional shipping costs apply to Marketplace purchases. Review shipping costs at checkout.

Summary

Kant's attempt to establish the principles behind the faculty of judgment remains one of the most important works on human reason. This third of the philosopher's threeCritiquesforms the very basis of modern aesthetics by establishing the almost universally accepted framework for debate of aesthetic issues.

Table of Contents

Editor's Introduction ix
Preface 1(4)
Introduction 5(22)
I. Of the division of Philosophy
5(2)
II. Of the realm of Philosophy in general
7(2)
III. Of the Critique of Judgment as a means of combining the two parts of Philosophy into a whole
9(2)
IV. Of Judgment as a faculty legislating a priori
11(2)
V. The principle of the formal purposiveness of nature is a transcendental principle of Judgment
13(4)
VI. Of the combination of the feeling of pleasure with the concept of the purposiveness of nature
17(2)
VII. Of the aesthetical representation of the purposiveness of nature
19(3)
VIII. Of the logical representation of the purposiveness of nature
22(2)
IX. Of the connexion of the legislation of Understanding with that of Reason by means of the Judgment
24(3)
First Part: Critique of the Aesthetical Judgment 27(126)
FIRST DIVISION: Analytic of the Aesthetical Judgment
27(110)
FIRST BOOK: Analytic of the Beautiful
27(34)
First Moment of the judgment of taste, according to quality
27(6)
§1. The judgment of taste is aesthetical
27(1)
§2. The satisfaction which determines the judgment of taste is disinterested
28(1)
§3. The satisfaction in the pleasant is bound up with interest
29(1)
§4. The satisfaction in the good is bound up with interest
30(2)
§5. Comparison of the three specifically different kinds of satisfaction
32(1)
Second Moment of the judgment of taste, viz. according to quantity
33(7)
§6. The Beautiful is that which apart from concepts is represented as the object of a universal satisfaction
33(1)
§7. Comparison of the Beautiful with the Pleasant and the Good by means of the above characteristic
34(1)
§8. The universality of the satisfaction is represented in a judgment of Taste only as subjective
35(3)
§9. Investigation of the question whether in the judgment of taste the feeling of pleasure precedes or follows the judging of the object
38(2)
Third Moment of judgments of taste, according to the relation of the purposes which are brought into consideration therein
40(14)
§10. Of purposiveness in general
40(1)
§11. The judgment of taste has nothing at its basis but the form of the purposiveness of an object (or of its mode of representation)
41(1)
§12. The judgment of taste rests on a priori grounds
42(1)
§13. The pure judgment of taste is independent of charm and emotion
43(1)
§14. Elucidation by means of examples
43(3)
§15. The judgment of taste is quite independent of the concept of perfection
46(2)
§16. The judgment of taste, by which an object is declared to be beautiful under the condition of a definite concept, is not pure
48(2)
§17. Of the Ideal of Beauty
50(4)
Fourth Moment of the judgment of taste, according to the modality of the satisfaction in the object
54(3)
§18. What the modality in a judgment of taste is
54(1)
§19. The subjective necessity, which we ascribe to the judgment of taste, is conditioned
55(1)
§20. The condition of necessity which a judgment of taste asserts is the Idea of a common sense
55(1)
§21. Have we ground for presupposing a common sense?
56(1)
§22. The necessity of the universal agreement that is thought in a judgment of taste is a subjective necessity, which is represented as objective under the presupposition of a common sense
56(1)
General remark on the first section of the Analytic
57(4)
SECOND BOOK: Analytic of the Sublime
61(76)
§23. Transition from the faculty which judges of the Beautiful to that which judges of the Sublime
61(2)
§24. Of the divisions of an investigation into the feeling of the sublime
63(1)
A. Of the Mathematically Sublime
64(10)
§25. Explanation of the term "sublime"
64(2)
§26. Of that estimation of the magnitude of natural things which is requisite for the Idea of the Sublime
66(5)
§27. Of the quality of the satisfaction in our judgments upon the Sublime
71(3)
B. Of the Dynamically Sublime in Nature
74(5)
§28. Of Nature regarded as Might
74(3)
§29. Of the modality of the judgment upon the sublime in nature
77(2)
General remark upon the exposition of the aesthetical reflective Judgment
79(11)
Deduction of [pure] aesthetical judgments
90(47)
§30. The Deduction of aesthetical judgments on the objects of nature must not be directed to what we call Sublime in nature, but only to the Beautiful
90(1)
§31. Of the method of deduction of judgments of Taste
91(1)
§32. First peculiarity of the judgment of Taste
92(2)
§33. Second peculiarity of the judgment of Taste
94(1)
§34. There is no objective principle of Taste possible
95(1)
§35. The principle of Taste is the subjective principle of Judgment in general
96(1)
§36. Of the problem of a Deduction of judgments of Taste
97(1)
§37. What is properly asserted a priori of an object in a judgment of Taste
98(1)
§38. Deduction of judgments of Taste
98(2)
§39. Of the communicability of a sensation
100(1)
§40. Of Taste as a kind of sensus communis
101(2)
§41. Of the empirical interest in the Beautiful
103(2)
§42. Of the intellectual interest in the Beautiful
105(4)
§43. Of Art in general
109(1)
§44. Of beautiful Art
110(1)
§45. Beautiful Art is an art, in so far as it seems like nature
111(1)
§46. Beautiful Art is the art of genius
112(1)
§47. Elucidation and confirmation of the above explanation of Genius
113(2)
§48. Of the relation of Genius to Taste
115(2)
§49. Of the faculties of the mind that constitute Genius
117(5)
§50. Of the combination of Taste with Genius in the products of beautiful Art
122(1)
§51. Of the division of the beautiful arts
123(4)
§52. Of the combination of beautiful arts in one and the same product
127(1)
§53. Comparison of the respective aesthetical worth of the beautiful arts
128(3)
§54. Remark
131(6)
SECOND DIVISION: Dialectic of the Aesthetical Judgment
137(16)
§55.
137(1)
§56. Representation of the antimony of Taste
137(1)
§57. Solution of the antinomy of Taste
138(6)
§58. Of the Idealism of the purposiveness of both nature and Art as the unique principle of the aesthetical Judgment
144(4)
§59. Of Beauty as the symbol of Morality
148(3)
§60. Appendix: Of the method of Taste
151(2)
Second Part: Critique of the Teleological Judgment 153(45)
§61. Of the objective purposiveness of Nature
153(2)
FIRST DIVISION: Analytic of the Teleological Judgment
155(18)
§62. Of the objective purposiveness which is merely formal as distinguished from that which is material
155(3)
§63. Of the relative, as distinguished from the inner, purposiveness of nature
158(3)
§64. Of the peculiar character of things as natural purposes
161(2)
§65. Things regarded as natural purposes are organised beings
163(3)
§66. Of the principle of judging of internal purposiveness in organised beings
166(1)
§67. Of the principle of the teleological judging of nature in general as a system of purposes
167(3)
§68. Of the principle of Teleology as internal principle of natural science
170(3)
SECOND DIVISION: Dialectic of the Teleological Judgment
173(25)
§69. What is an antinomy of the Judgment?
173(1)
§70. Representation of this antinomy
174(1)
§71. Preliminary to the solution of the above antinomy
175(1)
§72. Of the different systems which deal with the purposiveness of nature
176(2)
§73. None of the above systems give what they pretend
178(3)
§74. The reason that we cannot treat the concept of a Technic of nature dogmatically is the fact that a natural purpose is inexplicable
181(2)
§75. The concept of an objective purposiveness of nature is a critical principle of Reason for the reflective Judgment
183(2)
§76. Remark
185(3)
§77. Of the peculiarity of the human Understanding, by means of which the concept of a natural purpose is possible
188(5)
§78. Of the union of the principle of the universal mechanism of matter with the teleological principle in the Technic of nature
193(5)
Appendix: Methodology of the Teleological Judgment 198(46)
§79. Whether teleology must be treated as if it belonged to the doctrine of nature
198(1)
§80. Of the necessary subordination of the mechanical to the teleological principle in the explanation of a thing as a natural purpose
199(3)
§81. Of the association of mechanism with the teleological principle in the explanation of a natural purpose as a natural product
202(3)
§82. Of the teleological system in the external relations of organised beings
205(4)
§83. Of the ultimate purpose of nature as a teleological system
209(3)
§84. Of the final purpose of the existence of a world, i.e. of creation itself
212(2)
§85. Of Physico-theology
214(5)
§86. Of Ethico-theology
219(4)
§87. Of the moral proof of the Being of God
223(4)
§88. Limitation of the validity of the moral proof
227(5)
§89. Of the use of the moral argument
232(1)
§90. Of the kind of belief in a teleological proof of the Being of God
233(5)
§91. Of the kind of belief produced by a practical faith
238(6)
General remarks on Teleology 244

An electronic version of this book is available through VitalSource.

This book is viewable on PC, Mac, iPhone, iPad, iPod Touch, and most smartphones.

By purchasing, you will be able to view this book online, as well as download it, for the chosen number of days.

Digital License

You are licensing a digital product for a set duration. Durations are set forth in the product description, with "Lifetime" typically meaning five (5) years of online access and permanent download to a supported device. All licenses are non-transferable.

More details can be found here.

A downloadable version of this book is available through the eCampus Reader or compatible Adobe readers.

Applications are available on iOS, Android, PC, Mac, and Windows Mobile platforms.

Please view the compatibility matrix prior to purchase.